Friday, July 1, 2011

Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010

images wallpaper 2010 Nina Dobrev Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. for black women 2010. prom
  • for black women 2010. prom


  • mani_r1
    09-01 03:12 PM
    was it tsc or nsc?

    tsc




    wallpaper for black women 2010. prom Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. girlfriend taylor swift no
  • girlfriend taylor swift no


  • Macaca
    12-10 10:06 AM
    I am doing the following even if there are 0 takers.


    Educate lawmakers about retorgression.
    Prioritize interim options based on controversial factor. Some forum posts have good ideas.
    Start right now. I don't know how to enjoy holidays without any hope.


    I don't understand all the issues (like EAD). In order to proceed, I am trying to understand (= validate + document) the

    process and platform (senate/congress) on which retrogression will be addressed.
    process and platform on which interim measure can be introduced.
    effect of each interim measure.




    Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. tattoo makeup taylor swift no
  • tattoo makeup taylor swift no


  • willigetagc
    08-18 02:34 PM
    The other day you spent the entire day answering every question(s) people had. I even told my wife that our good friend is going to take all our worries out pretty soon. EB2 will no longer going accept porting so we will go faster and then guess what you didn't even file the law suit yet....you let us down!!

    I have a humble suggestion for you, please concentrate on your work and read some books on ethics and leave the GC processing to CIS.

    This is weird... It does'nt look like you are joking, so are you are indirectly demanding and taunting a Mr anonymous to take some action?

    action from which you will benefit directly and is also something which you feel strongly about but will not do anything by yourself? :eek:




    2011 girlfriend taylor swift no Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. Taylor Swift Switches It Up
  • Taylor Swift Switches It Up


  • desi3933
    07-10 12:44 PM
    .....
    6. Again, Permanent job is a job that is expected to last unknown term and is not defined for a period.

    Can you point us to a USCIS/DOL resource to confirm that definition of "permanent "job?


    Permanent means job that is for for a term of indefinite or unlimited duration.
    http://www.uscis.gov/err/B3%20-%20Outstanding%20Professors%20and%20Researchers/Decisions_Issued_in_2004/MAR232004_01B3203.pdf



    .....
    H-1B job is not permanent since they have end date specified by LCA and H-1B visa petition.

    If *no* H1B job is "permanent," as you say, then how can that job be permanent after filing PERM or I-140? Second, following your argument, if you're on H-1B and changed employers using AC21, the new job wouldn't be considered "permanent," right? Third, if H-1B job is not "permanent," then which one is?

    AC-21 is not just for changing GC employer.
    AC-21 is for
    1. H-1B portability - starting new H1-B immediately after filing opf new petition
    2. Extension of H-1B beyond 6 years - if labor is pending > 365 days or I-140 is approved/pending. Since each H-1B petition is linked to LCA and LCA is for temp job, each H1 petition is a new or extension of temp job.
    3. Changing of GC employer - Please note that you can change your GC employer even without changing job, just by getting job offer from new employer, as GC job is for job starting after I-485 approval.

    Do not confuse existing H-1B job with future GC job.

    H-1B is linked to LCA (Temp Job) (http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/h-1b.cfm) Note: The link clearly says

    The H-1B program allows an employer to temporarily employ a foreign worker in the U.S. on a nonimmigrant basis in a specialty occupation or as a fashion model of distinguished merit and ability.

    On the other hand, I-140 is linked to Permanent Labor Certification (http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/perm.cfm) (aka GC labor)



    more...

    Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. Brian Doben#39;s Taylor Swift
  • Brian Doben#39;s Taylor Swift


  • georchen
    09-12 03:10 PM
    My app was sent to NSC on 7/2 but I-140 approved from TSC. Still no receipts, no checks encashed. Called USCIS, and they asked me to call after 90 days. Any ideas ? Is anyone else in the same boat ?

    I'm in the same boat. no checks encashed. no receipts. Pray God every day.




    Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. taylor swift cd back
  • taylor swift cd back


  • brij523
    12-10 11:58 AM
    Hi other IV users,

    Did you read the post I wrote above? I think IV need some member who can do foot work. I think IV will agree with my assessment. What is others assessment? If we want to get something done we have to make some strategic and concentrated move.
    Not everything could be written on this site.
    If you are interested PM me. We can talk privately.



    more...

    Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. Taylor Swift, 1.
  • Taylor Swift, 1.


  • Winner
    02-09 08:32 PM
    Did you all see Donald Trumps answer to Piers Morgans question in Piers Morgan tonight program on CNN? that was not a yotal surprise, but after his talk about China and India, that was a little bit surprising.




    2010 tattoo makeup taylor swift no Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. wallpaper 2010 Nina Dobrev
  • wallpaper 2010 Nina Dobrev


  • abhisam
    07-15 01:05 AM
    I applied for my EAD and AP renewal on the second week of May 2008. Again, I am not sure if EAD or AP renewal triggered the FP notice. Good luck to you.

    thank you mhtanim. i would appreciate it if you could let me know when you recieve your ead..would like to track how long it takes. i am worried that i would not recieve by renewal before my current ead expires.



    more...

    Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. Taylor Swift covers December
  • Taylor Swift covers December


  • PresidentO
    02-26 01:12 PM
    Thanks Akhil for the write up

    You answered some of the stuff very nice.

    To the guy who is MAD,

    Be MAD that you and your friends chose to ignore IV during the biggest screw up of USCIS.

    It sounded very condescending that they are ready to give 1000USD now, when they are probably feeling the pinch, and ignored any efforts before/during/after the fiasco.

    I did not say this the first time but now I can say this. People who say I will give 1000$ to IV, 10000$ to IV or the big amounts think that they are playing carrots and sticks. So you want the core members to come out and lay out the strategy on which member of congress is sympathetic to the situation and might do some thing. Yeah! right. Let the tunnel rat guy go and tell every guild, numbers usa idiot that what IV is up to.

    Money is one of the pieces of this effort. Grass roots efforts are another piece. As Akhil said, people who work at the grass roots efforts dont have the shareholder or value for my buck mentality. Also, my friend, in the current volatile environment, problems do not blaring horns out for you and me. I am still amazed how two reporters sensationally linked H1B and Banking industry to get a bill on the floor. It is those two reporters who called Grassley and ignited his draconian mind.

    Watch out what kind of reports are going to run in Mar and Moira Herbst already reported a bill in works by Durbin and Grassley. D & G will attempt to remove the 6th year extensions no matter what, revoke some of the AC21 provisions and god knows what they are penning down now. Then all of us, those who are sleeping, those who are pretending to sleep can wake up for real.

    It is a shame that our community will flock to Bollywood/Kollywood/Tollywood events and shell out 20-50 $ per seat but considers contributing to IV as some thing that needs to be seen through the magnifying lens 100 times.




    hair Taylor Swift Switches It Up Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. Taylor Swift covers December
  • Taylor Swift covers December


  • chanduv23
    07-08 03:04 PM
    The exchange between Chanduv and Desi3933 has been a refreshingly objective discussion and is a welcome change from the typical hyper-reactionary posts one sees more frequently in this forum.

    One of the features of the fight for EB immigration reforms we all need to be cognizant of is - that most (99%) of the members are in this fight to solve an immediate personal problem (visa situation) in a timely manner - most of us are not in it because we believe it to be a cause larger than us and a cause that demands personal sacrifice - and hence the lack of collective passion (lukewarm responses to IV sponsored drives, donation efforts etc.)

    While - many have tried to compare this cause to India's independence struggle or Gandhiji's movement in South Africa - but the fundamental difference is that in both these struggles - people who led the struggles led it at a personal cost (Gandhiji willingly gave away a lucrative career to take up the struggle and so did Nehru; Netaji Bose was a Civil Services Officer and gave it up) - even the vast majority of revolutionaries (Bhagat Singh et al) were college educated professionals who could easily have had nice careers in British India.........and therein lies the fundamental difference......not one of us would willingly give up what we have for this struggle - we are in it because we are stuck in a system and want some resolution.......as soon as our particular situation gets resolved...we move on....(maybe there are a few exceptions and hats off to these folks).........and hence Desi - the answer to your question why H1 does not care for F1 and EAD does not care for H1 and so on.......it is not a collective cause - it is just a collection of individual causes - thats all - we would be fooling ourselves if we had some other grandiose visions - calling this group a cause would be the same as calling passengers on a bus one group - they are in the same bus simply because they share a part of their journey - thats it

    Well said. healthy discussions help introspect ourselves. In day to day life we seldom see people trying to be wise and good. At workplaces, there is no healthy discussion - all people do is to watch out their backs and talk accordingly - which leads to false perspectives. These days when we give a good advice to friends or someone they may not percieve it in a good way with a "stop preaching me - go help yourself" attitude.



    more...

    Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. 2010 house taylor swift no
  • 2010 house taylor swift no


  • prince_waiting
    07-20 07:32 AM
    I pledge 200 USD; a small salutation to a great act.




    hot Brian Doben#39;s Taylor Swift Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. Taylor Swift Dresses 2010.
  • Taylor Swift Dresses 2010.


  • coloniel60
    06-11 01:17 PM
    When I asked my employer to send me an employment letter so that I can file my I-485 application on my own, my employer insisisted that I mail him all the I-485 documents and a check for $2500 on his name and that he will add the employment letter and mail the application to USCIS.

    Apart from gaining $1000 (2500 I sent him - 1500 for I-485 fees) does the employer benifit anything by mailing the application himself. Am I correct in assuming that I will receive the receipt notice even if the employer mailed the application to USCIS (He is not using a lawyer to represent me)? :confused: :confused: :confused:



    more...

    house Tags: 2010 amas, 2010 american Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. 2010 house Taylor Swift
  • 2010 house Taylor Swift


  • waitnwatch
    06-26 11:47 AM
    I am sure the democrats can harp on the point that non-passage of CIR means that an effective security component too does not go into effect. Point to note though is how effectively the message is delivered.

    ..... The Republican House is in a no win situation, passage means amnesty (their words, not mine) and non-passage makes them look ineffective. .....




    tattoo taylor swift cd back Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. Taylor Swift; Taylor Swift
  • Taylor Swift; Taylor Swift


  • CADude
    05-23 05:13 PM
    I webfax and send email to CA Senetor.



    more...

    pictures Taylor Swift, 1. Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. wallpaper taylor swift and
  • wallpaper taylor swift and


  • diptam
    06-23 12:15 AM
    Employers who are asking to sign 2 yr agreement are pretty clever in hatching the words - Make sure you don't give the wrong finger :D

    Take it easy...

    What if you assure him by signing a 2 year bond. Once you get the card, give him the finger




    dresses Taylor Swift Dresses 2010. Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. Country pop singer Taylor
  • Country pop singer Taylor


  • ssa
    06-22 04:59 PM
    My labour and I-140 is approved last year and I am working with current employer from last 1 and half years. Employer is making good money trough me....
    m very much in tension and he is talking to me.

    Can someone suggest what may be the option for me?

    Its all about how you negotiate. You may have some leeway in your negotiations if you have enough years left on your H1B. If all other peaceful negotiations fail let them know - without loosing your temper - that filing I 485 is the most important thing for you at this point and if it does not get done before the PDs retrogress again you will look out for other job using H1B transfer. All they worry about is the billing money they get out of you and they are worried once you file I-485 they will loose it in 6 months due to AC21. If you make them see that they will loose it other way too they may cut some deal with you.
    Just my 2 cents



    more...

    makeup Taylor Swift covers December Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. Tags: 2010 amas, 2010 american
  • Tags: 2010 amas, 2010 american


  • humdesi
    12-17 10:24 PM
    Moderators,
    Please merge this thread with the other depression thread. Don't let collective wealth on depression therapy advice get lost.




    girlfriend Taylor Swift; Taylor Swift Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. taylor swift back to december
  • taylor swift back to december


  • tonyHK12
    11-19 04:22 PM
    Question to IV core...

    After receiving the standard email respose from the congressman/senator...I am wondering are they even aware about the legal immigrants. All we are getting the standard template which is talking about only illegals and DREAM.

    No mention about legals ?

    Yes generally these replies come in from one of their workers, maybe even a trainee.

    Thats why IV wants everyone to call back the Senator/US Reps office mentioning the email response, and ask why our problems were not addressed (legal immigrants) and that you need more clarifications. Typically they have a person handling immigration issues.
    mentioning only the two we are campaigning for right now:
    1. Employment based Visa recapture
    2. Protecting children of legal immigrants from aging out regime

    this is even more important than just sending an email
    Better yet if you can meet if not call in the next 7-10 days.




    hairstyles 2010 house taylor swift no Taylor Swift Vogue Photo Shoot 2010. kicked Taylor Swift
  • kicked Taylor Swift


  • MightyIndian
    09-26 10:53 PM
    We filed on July 20 to NSC. CSC acknowledged the receipt on September 19. On 9/21 we recd a notice from CSC stating that our cases are transferred to NSC. However EAD and AP applications are still being proceesed by CSC. Just recd an e-mail that EAD card production ordered.




    Sachin_Stock
    09-25 12:34 PM
    Here's what the law says:

    8 CFR 204.5(e) relating to PD transfer between eb categories

    (e) Retention of section 203(b) (1), (2), or (3) priority date. A petition approved on behalf of an alien under sections 203(b) (1), (2), or (3) of the Act accords the alien the priority date of the approved petition for any subsequently filed petition for any classification under sections 203(b) (1), (2), or (3) of the Act for which the alien may qualify. In the event that the alien is the beneficiary of multiple petitions under sections 203(b) (1), (2), or (3) of the Act, the alien shall be entitled to the earliest priority date. A petition revoked under sections 204(e) or 205 of the Act will not confer a priority date, nor will any priority date be established as a result of a denied petition. A priority date is not transferable to another alien.

    I hope that clears the air.




    wait4ever
    08-10 11:28 AM
    Same here...

    Last night at 10:45 PM I received two emails for me and my wife for "approval notice sent"...

    Hopefully, I will have my cards in hand by next week.

    Thanks and god bless all!

    I git the I-485 Approval mail on 8/4/08 - but I have not recd any CPO mail or welcome PR mail - nor have I recd the notices in the mail -should Itake Infopass appt ?



    No comments:

    Post a Comment