Sunday, June 19, 2011

formal short hairstyles

images Sexy Formal Short Hairstyles formal short hairstyles. Short Hairstyles,
  • Short Hairstyles,


    • Jaime
    09-11 04:01 PM
    by coming to DC!!!



    wallpaper Short Hairstyles, formal short hairstyles. Short formal hairstyles
  • Short formal hairstyles


    • nmdial
    04-08 04:54 PM
    Not sure...since we are all talking about 12K and only 2 months movement. Are they cautious or we are all missing something?

    Personally, I think they (USCIS) have no clue therefore DOS has been extremely cautious.



    formal short hairstyles. Short hairstyles have graced
  • Short hairstyles have graced


    • optimystic
    03-19 06:01 PM
    May be this is the general process, but I know of a case with RD in June last week and PD in 2003 Mar got approved last Nov/Dec area. It is an EB3 India case.

    gccube are you EB3 -I as well?

    "
    FBI Namecheck -- Cleared (02/01/2008)
    FP -- Cleared "

    How did you find out the status of your namecheck and FP?



    2011 Short formal hairstyles formal short hairstyles. formal short hairstyles.
  • formal short hairstyles.


    • rakeshverma72
    03-30 12:44 PM
    PD: 06/26/2006
    Category: EB2
    I140 Approved: 02/14/2006
    485 Filed: 07/02/2007 (NSC) -- Pending
    H1-B:- 9th year expiring on May 26th 2010
    EAD:-Valid till 09/2/2010
    AP:- Valid till 09/2/2010

    I work for big consulting firm - Lockheed Martin. Where they have different business groups under different VP. And Pretty much my project works as it's own company. And I try to maintain both H1-B and EAD(AP) valid.

    While filing my Green card I was filed under Lockheed Martin-Federal(Subsidiary of Lockheed Martin) and also I got my H1-B approved in May 2007(Valid until May 2010) under Lockheed Martin-Federal. End of 2008 my business unit's VP changed and so the name of Subsidiary with different FEIN and from September 2008 I work for Lockheed Martin-S&L(Subsidiary of Lockheed Martin). So for the year 2008 I got two W2 one from Lockheed Martin-Federal and another from Lockheed Martin-S&L. As I was working for Lockheed Martin and the same project since I have filed my Green Card; I never thought my case would be of any issue.

    But after reading about AC-21 I have following questions from the community

    1) In case above, do I need to file for AC-21. Or will I be okay at the time of my Green Card approval.

    2) I have travel plans in the month of June 2010 to Europe. Should I worry about re-entering US with AP.

    3) My lawyer is applying for H1-B under new companies name, do you think my H1-B will get approved with the new company name.

    Thanks a lot


    more...

    formal short hairstyles. Mena Suvari Short Hairstyle
  • Mena Suvari Short Hairstyle


    • tinoue
    09-27 09:10 AM
    Hi LRIndy,
    Thank you very much for your quick reply.
    Now I feel better. After waiting for GC so long (I started the application process in 2003), any small things make me worry...

    Thanks!



    formal short hairstyles. Formal Hairstyles
  • Formal Hairstyles


    • bfadlia
    02-21 12:11 PM
    https://egov.immigration.gov/cris/jsps/ptimes.jsp


    more...

    formal short hairstyles. Short formal Hairstyles like
  • Short formal Hairstyles like


    • atul555
    12-15 09:52 PM
    Atul555:

    Cool down. Nothing to be warried. Since you are married, 485 is not of much help. So you should think of maintaining h1b in order to keep your wife status h4.

    1. With cool mind start applying for jobs, increase network. To be on safer side. find a good consultant. Ping me if you need help in finding a good consulatant. Yes when say good consualtant..he is good...!!!!

    you still have 4 months time. SO cheer up.

    My 2 cents..don't think of using EAD & keeping u r wife on foloow to join blah blah....!!!!

    Also if you change your job , your GC journey you had so far will not get wasted. You don't have to file Labour/i-40 again. Make sure the new job is same or similiar. Discuss with your potential employer, they will help you.

    Whats your area of work..??Are you into IT...????

    Thanks everyone, your input has been very helpful.
    I am assuming, my EB3 India PD of Mar 2004 would take about two years to become current and once it does, I can file my spouse as dependent and attain EAD for both of us.
    Till then based on your inputs I believe I have two recourse.
    1> I transfer my H1 and keep the spouse on H4. AC21 would apply in that case and my GC process would continue unabated.
    2> I go on EAD and put my wife on F1 to maitain legal status.

    Here are the caveats with each.
    With no 1 approach there would be very few jobs for H1-b next year and I would probably have to be at the mercy of some unscrouplous desi consultant.

    With no 2 approach, I have more choices in job but I have to get my wife on F1 which would be a drain on finances as well as time consuming for the spouse.

    I guess either way I have to tough it out for a couple of years and I was leaning towards no. 1.


    BTW, tabletpc, thanks for your suggestion, I am in IT (J2EE websphere) background with considerable experience. I would appreciate any input for a good consultant.



    2010 Short hairstyles have graced formal short hairstyles. Sexy Formal Short Hairstyles
  • Sexy Formal Short Hairstyles


    • skagitswimmer
    June 7th, 2005, 08:00 AM
    Thanks again. What threw me was that even though the detail was blown there was lots of colour. It is not like when it gets blown to white by direct sunlight.

    The shot we are all talking about was originally in RAW, by the way.

    This is the time in a while that I have identified a problem that wouldn't be solved with a large expenditure of cash
    Current Status: Document mailed to applicant. [Archive] - Immigration Voice
    Log in

    View Full Version : Current Status: Document mailed to applicant.



    more...

    formal short hairstyles. hairstyles for short hair
  • hairstyles for short hair


    • sreenivas11
    11-16 10:39 AM
    Nov' 07 Processing times are not posted yet



    hair formal short hairstyles. formal short hairstyles. Best short Formal Hairstyles
  • Best short Formal Hairstyles


    • 9411b
    03-06 12:56 PM
    You are not alone.

    We have the same problem.

    EAD applied in July 07, EAD card received in Oct 07 and the card was made expired 01/01/07 by WAC.

    Called USCIS hotline, tried new applications with WAC, TSC and Info pass, still waiting if WAC is going to correct its own mess.

    Big headache.

    Good luck everyone.

    J

    PS. concurrently filing with NSC then moved to WAC then to TSC. Now pending!!!!:(:(


    more...

    formal short hairstyles. Elegant Formal Short
  • Elegant Formal Short


    • milind70
    07-07 02:13 PM
    How many years of years of W-2 form copies do we need to attach, when we file I-485 applications?
    There is no definate answer,but in general lawyers ask for last three W2 with last three paystubs plus last three years returns filing copy.



    hot Mena Suvari Short Hairstyle formal short hairstyles. formal hairstyles for short
  • formal hairstyles for short


    • gkaplan
    04-22 01:27 PM
    I think i understand:) Thank you.
    As I might have already mentioned, i've been working for a company for 2 years now with my EAD, they are willing to sponsor for H1B. so as long as my J principal has a waiver, then my company shoulnd face any problems on applying for a H1B right?

    Could you please explain "As long as the H1-B quota is not exhausted and the petition was correctly filed". ? Is there a deadline to apply for H1B ?

    i really appreciate your opinoins, thank you very much.


    more...

    house 2011 formal short hair styles formal short hairstyles. formal hairstyles for long
  • formal hairstyles for long


    • fundo14
    02-19 12:36 PM
    Hi All,

    I wanted to share my experience at the port of entry using AP.

    Just to give a quick background me and my wife have been working on H1 for last 8 years, we both were working on our H1’s at the time of leaving for vacation one month back.
    Our 485/EAD/AP was filed on July 2nd, 2007; my wife is a Primary Applicant.

    We have our 485 receipts/ approved EAD’s and AP’s with us.

    Also, our H1 Petition’s are valid till 2010 but the stamping on passport is expired, we did not get stamping in India as we intended to enter using AP

    At the Port of entry this is how it went:

    Officer: Very rudely asked for our passports & I-94
    We gave him our Passports, I-94 forms and Original AP’s

    Officer: What’s the purpose of your visit?
    Our Answer: To join back at our respective work.

    Officer: Work? Who’s the primary applicant?
    My answer: My wife

    Officer: Then how the hell you will work here, you cannot work here, only your wife can work as the petition is on her name, you are a derivative.
    My answer: But I have work Authorization (showed our EAD cards)

    Officer: That’s all bullhshit, does not mean anything…you can not work here.
    My answer: I politely told him that sir when we left country a month ago we both were working on H1’s, now we are seeking entry on AP.

    Officer: yeh but don’t do fraud, you cannot work here (Very rudely)...who told you that you can work here.
    My Answer: Again I explained politely- Sir, we filed for 485 which made us eligible to get EAD’s, showed him the EAD card again (which clearly states “Authorized to work in US till validity of this card” Our EAD’s are valid till end of 2008)

    Officer: listen don’t teach me law, I have been working here for “x” number of years, and you think you know laws better than me.

    After this I and my wife decided to keep quite as that moron was not ready to listen and understand anything.

    Officer (rudely): I will set this straight for you…then we were asked to follow him in a separate room. Many people were waiting there I guess most of them using AP

    The Officer went to one other custom officer there and pointed towards us and explained him something which we could not hear.

    We waited � an hour till our named was called…I was worried that they will now create lot problems for us but to my surprise we were just handed our Passports along with AP’s / I-94 stamped as “AOS” and told you are all set... Absolutely No questions asked.

    I am worried if he has entered some nasty remarks on my case…not sure.

    Now this entire incident makes me wonder what that officer was talking about, my guess is one of the following:

    1. He assumed throughout that my wife is entering on H1 and I on H4
    2. Or he did realize his mistake but was too egoistic to accept it.
    3. Or he was right and I was wrong about working on EAD (being derivative)...am I missing something here??

    One of my suggestion from all this experience is that anybody entering on AP always state the purpose of visit is to “Resume pending AOS”

    In last 8 years I have re-entered US like 6 times but never faced such a rude Immigration officer or have been treated like this.

    Guru’s please advice if there is a possibility to reinstate our status as H1, we would rather work on H1 then on EAD’s

    Thanks!



    tattoo Formal Hairstyles formal short hairstyles. short funky hairstyles
  • short funky hairstyles


    • stxvr
    07-07 04:24 PM
    I am on H1B. I am palnning to file AOS. Category F1 is Child of unmarried son of US citizen(family based).

    The LCA and Petition papers used for the my H1 Visa (at consulate interview) has the Job Title Programmer I and location A. But before coming to USA I got reassigned and I got a new LCA from the company (I got new LCA in India itself). Recently I looked into that New LCA it has recorded my Job Title as Programmer II and my current location location B.
    I have following question.

    My questions:
    1. Does this Probrammer I/ Probrammer II change in LCAs affects my AOS.
    2. If my oroginal petition and LCA has the job title programmer I and after that I got new LCA for new location with Job title programmer II than it is OK Or I must have to have the job title programmer I (same as matching with original petition)


    more...

    pictures Short formal Hairstyles like formal short hairstyles. black formal hairstyle
  • black formal hairstyle


    • simplefun
    07-01 01:08 PM
    Yes, pending I-485 applicants can absolutely get FAFSA. I have received funding for my MBA at Haas and know many others who have received funding as well. If you need any information, send me a PM and I'll respond to your queries



    dresses formal hairstyles for short formal short hairstyles. Semi Formal Medium Length
  • Semi Formal Medium Length


    • immig4me
    04-22 01:44 PM
    try it and let us know how that works out for you :D:DSo basically you are saying you cannot sue the people responsible for greencard problem.

    I think the only option left is to either sue God or sue yourself for your bad luck.


    more...

    makeup hairstyles for short hair formal short hairstyles. 2011 formal short hair styles
  • 2011 formal short hair styles


    • Munna Bhai
    03-24 01:55 PM
    audio streaming archives are available 1 to 2 hours after the show. Check here http://wamu.org/programs/kn/08/03/24.php#20155.

    Our segment was about 40 minutes in. My web streamer won't allow fast forward, don't know if limitation is the client or the server. Robert and Ron go through the standard Pro / Anti H1B arguments for the first 40 minutes. I didn't want to be part of that.

    I hate listening to my own voice, thanks for the complements, it will make listening to my own voice less cringing.

    Mark,

    Thank you very very much for this great initiative. It was a wonderful work.

    -M



    girlfriend short funky hairstyles formal short hairstyles. short nice hairstyles male
  • short nice hairstyles male


    • reallow23
    09-28 09:49 PM
    Hello Everyone,

    Thank for all your help..My case have been pending over a year now of the due date......So can I file the Mandamus????



    hairstyles Elegant Formal Short formal short hairstyles. Girls Formal Hairstyle in
  • Girls Formal Hairstyle in


    • amsgc
    04-02 08:47 PM
    I agree, if you have applied for I-485, F1 is not a good idea. I wasn't aware of the OP's GC situation.

    Editing post: It seems that the OP applied for I-140 late last year, and the country of chargeability is India (public profile). So, in this case, F1 is probably a better bet.

    All other points are on the dot!
    Only F1 being better than h4 is really depending on one's situation..
    F1 is Non-Immigrant intent status.. meaning, if you apply for 140, or even have LC applied and USCIS finds out.. you can forget abt getting visa..
    Secondly, F1 has become much restrictive since implementation of SEVIS.
    H4 on the other hand is duel intent

    Major advantages of F1 would be
    1. Possible on-campus 20hr work authorization and later OPT authorization.
    2 Chances of getting assistanceship.

    So it's not black and white..
    and if you've applied for 485.. F1 is really definitely not the way to go..



    styrum
    10-26 10:05 PM
    I got this as a real paper letter. The signature is a picture, of course, not real.
    No surprise here. We are not even a part of immigration reform for him.:mad:
    So in this standard reply "about immigration reform" we are not even mentioned.

    EDWARD M. KENNEDY
    MASSACHUSETTS
    Uinited States
    WASHINGTON, DC 20510-2101
    October 9, 2007


    Dear Mr. :
    Thank you for contacting me about immigration reform. This is a complex issue, with many important aspects, and it requires a comprehensive solution. 12 million undocumented workers are now living in the United States. They're working, paying taxes, and raising children who are U.S. citizens if they are born here. They contribute to our economy, and it is time to bring them out of the shadows and end their unfair exploitation by unscrupulous employers in communities across the country.
    Funds for border enforcement have increased dramatically over the years. The budget for the Border Patrol has increased from $263 million in 1990 to $1.6 billion today - a six-fold increase. Yet each year during this period, hundreds of thousands of immigrants have continued to enter the U.S. illegally. Our immigration laws are clearly broken, and stronger border enforcement alone will not fix them.
    Long and thorough negotiations with the White House and fellow Senators, Republican and Democrat, led to the drafting of a comprehensive bipartisan immigration reform bill this year. It contained important provisions to strengthen border security, but it also contained needed provisions imposing higher penalties on businesses that employ undocumented immigrants, a temporary worker program to help American businesses meet their employment needs, and provisions to address the millions of undocumented immigrants living in the United States by allowing them to obtain legal status after undergoing background checks, paying a fine, and going to the back of the line for green cards. The bill was a realistic and comprehensive solution that would not only protect our borders, but also enable needed temporary workers to enter the country legally, and allow workers already here to become legal.
    Unfortunately, this needed legislation has now stalled in the Senate, which is enormously disappointing for Congress and the country. But the battle is far from over. I'm in it for the long haul, and Fm certain that, in the end, we will prevail. Ignoring the problem will not solve it. We cannot afford to do nothing, especially in this post-9/11 era. By heritage and history, America is a nation of immigrants, and we must preserve this tradition. I will continue to fight to reform our immigration laws, so that our borders are secure and immigrant families can continue to live the American dream.
    Again, thank you for writing to me about this important issue.
    Sincerely,

    Edward M. Kennedy



    sonline
    05-20 06:01 PM
    Not favoring Wipro or quitting person here. General comment..

    we need to be careful and review all aspect of issues with mgr and HR before leaving service companies. If we really want to come and work in US then come as independent companies on H1. People keep quite and say 'yes' for everything until H1 is filed in offshore and once a high paid offer comes then leaving and start saying 'sue' this company etc.

    they pay fees for H1/air-fares/insurances for commitment for onsite work for some period. If person A goes out, they have to invest same amount of $ on new person B to get there and loosing credit at client also. Are these factors not overhead to these kind of companies?

    Becoming so much emotional for money matters is quite common. Be practical and think wisely and negotiate peacefully with HR/MGR. Sending mails with lot of anger and threats to companies etc really don't much help in practical life and things go worse. this kind of stories is not first time and has been going for many years, think it from both sides.

    Be practical, thinking peacefully. All the best.


    Posted by Adolfa at 1:18 AM

    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)